Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Title: Responding to Suspected Violations of the Stark Law That Do Not Implicate the Anti-Kickback Statute
Subject: Office of Compliance & Corporate Integrity (OCCI)
Policy No: OCCI:2013:C09
Applies: RowanSOM
Issuing Authority: Rowan President & RowanSOM Dean
Responsible Officer: Chief Audit, Compliance & Privacy Officer;  Rowan General Counsel
Date Adopted:  07/01/2013
Last Revision: 0301/3026/20202021
Last Reviewed: 03 01/3026/20202021

I.    PURPOSE

To ensure that the Related Healthcare Entities follow the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Voluntary Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol (SRDP) when appropriate.

...

  1. A statement describing why RowanSOM believes a violation of the Stark Law may have occurred, including a complete legal analysis of the application of the Stark Law to the conduct related to the alleged violation, as well as any self-referral exception that may apply to the conduct;
  2. Describe the circumstances under which the disclosed matter was discovered, as well as, any immediate corrective action which has been taken to prevent the continuation of this alleged violation and/or any potential future violations;
  3. Identifying information, including the name, address, national provider identification numbers, CMS Certification Number and Tax Identification Number of the disclosing RowanSOM entity;
  4. A statement identifying whether the disclosing RowanSOM entity has a history of similar conduct or has any prior enforcement actions against it;
  5. An indication of whether the disclosing RowanSOM entity has knowledge that the matter is under current inquiry by a government agency or contractor;
  6. A description of the nature of the matter being disclosed, including the type of financial relationship(s), the parties involved, the specific time periods of potential noncompliance, the circumstances under which the disclosed matter was discovered, the type of designated health service claims at issue, the type of transaction or other conduct at issue and the names of individuals and entities believed to be implicated, along with an explanation of their roles;
  7. A financial analysis, that states the amount that is actually or potentially due; describe the methodology for calculating the amount due; and summarize the auditing activity and documents upon which RowanSOM relied in calculating the total amount potentially due, itemized by year, including the "look back" period, (i.e. the time during which RowanSOM entity did not appear to be in Stark compliance.);
  8. The steps RowanSOM has taken to refund any applicable claims as directed by the VCP;
  9. A statement from the Chief Audit, Compliance & Privacy Officer certifying that the information provided is true and based on a good faith effort to resolve liability under the Stark law; and
  10. The steps RowanSOM will be taking to make disclosures under the SRDP, both electronically and by mail.

VI.  NON-COMPLIANCE AND SANCTIONS

Any individual who violates this policy shall be subject to discipline up to and including dismissal from the University in accordance with their union and University rules.  Civil and criminal penalties may be applied accordingly.  Violations of this policy may require retraining and be reviewed with employee during the annual appraisal process. The Deans of each College, Vice Presidents, and University President, with the assistance of the Department of Human Resources, will enforce the sanctions appropriately and consistently to all violators regardless of job titles or level within the University and in accordance with bargaining agreements for represented employees. Any sanction costs or fines will be borne by the Department and the Department Chair or VP will determine how these funds will be assigned.


By Direction of the President:

Signature on file

...